As part of building the ontology for capturing knowledge about HIV and AIDS, I came across UNAIDS’ Terminology Guidelines document. The document presents preferred terminology for discussing matters on HIV and AIDS. For example, response to AIDS is the prefered alternative to fight against AIDS.
There are many examples, but one in particular, made me realise that in writing my proposal, I came across as an imperialist of sort! I used the term intervention a number of times in articulating the goals of my work. As aptly put in the document,
“[t]his term conveys “doing something to someone or something” and as such undermines the concept of participatory responses.”
In some circles, this translates to imperialism. So in such circles all I can really say in my defense is: I was but an intended imperialist in writing the proposal. I will in the future try as much as I can to avoid terminology that may be perceived in any negative light 🙁